May 15th UPDATE: From Truthout.org:
How Accurate Was the 'Rove Indicted' Story?
On Saturday afternoon, we ran a breaking story titled, "Karl Rove Indicted on Charges of Perjury, Lying to Investigators." We assumed that we were well ahead of the mainstream media and that we would be subsequently questioned. Right on both counts.
What everyone is asking right now is how accurate is the story? Has Rove in fact been indicted? The story is accurate, and Karl Rove's attorneys have been served with an indictment.
In short, we had two sources close to the Fitzgerald investigation who were explicit about the information that we published, and a former high-ranking state department official who reported communication with a source who had "direct knowledge" of the meeting at Patton Boggs. In both instances, substantial detail was provided and matched.
We had confirmation. We ran the story.
Earlier Report:Bob Kall of OpedNews.com reports:
As editor of OpEdnews, I started wondering when Jason Leopold's news that Karl Rove was indicted, which we made our main headline, did not show up in the mainstream news. He's been superbly reliable and great and bringing news ahead of others. So I wrote to him:For what it's worth, it has also been reported that Joe Wilson, Valerie Plame's husband, also heard the same report of Rove's indictment.I’m getting emails asking why the mainstream media aren’t reporting on Rove’s indictment. Any word you can give me on what’s up?Jason replied:I have now been turned into the story—again. Robert Luskin and Mark Corallo, Rove’s attorney and spokesman, are liars. Damned liars. I have five sources on this. In the news business when you want to discredit a reporter and an explosive report you call the spokesman and get him to issue a denial. My reports have gone way beyond the spokesman and the lawyer to get to the truth. I am SHOCKED that the mainstream have followed this up by simply calling a spokesman.
I am amazed that the blogosphere would lend credence to the statements of people who have consistently lied about Rove’s role in this case. This is a White House that denied Rove’s involvement in the leak. This is a White House that has lied and lied and lied. And yet the first question that people ask is “why would Rove’s spokesman lie?” Because they can, because they do, and because they have. This is an administration that has attacked and discredited their detractors. I am amazed that not a single reporter would actually do any real investigative work and get to the bottom of this story. Surely, their must be another intrepid reporter out there that has sources beyond a spokesman.
- Karl Rove Indictment an elaborate Hoax? Did Jason Leopold get Rolled?
- BRIAN DICKERSON: Rove rumor red meat to blue state audience
- Washington Wire: Indictment for Rove?
"The Riddle of Rove" -- As the presidential adviser’s legal situation remains uncertain, Beltway pundits seek clues about his state of mind—and body.
- Update 3: Rove Said Unfazed by Chance of Charges - Forbes.com
- Asking Rove One Question
- Capitol Hill Blue's Blog - A Rove indictment? Truth or just wishful thinking?
- Rove Indictment Report Denied
- Will Pitt speaks to Jason Leopold this afternoon. (Leopold offers clarification)
- Rove Blames Iraq War for Low Bush Numbers - CBS News
- Salon.com - Daou Report - Jason Leopold and the Alleged Rove Indictment
Perhaps the sanest, most rational, calmest response to the Jason Leopold/Rove Indictment controversy comes from Peter Daou.
- Leopold Responds to Corallo's Denial of Fitzgerald - Luskin Meeting - TalkLeft