Daniel Trotta for Reuters reports:� "A New York Times decision to block British online readers from seeing a story about London terrorism suspects raises new questions on restricting the flow of information in the Internet age, legal and media experts say.
The New York Times said on Tuesday it had blocked British Internet readers from seeing a story detailing elements of the investigation into a suspected plot to blow up airliners between Britain and the United States.
The story was published in Monday's paper. Under British laws, courts will punish media organizations that publish material that judges feel may influence jurors and prevent suspects receiving a fair trial...."
The Unknown Candidate:
Gee. I can think of another reason for this precedent-setting decision by the NY Times. Perhaps some of the information given to Americans varies from the information provided by the Brits? Perhaps Bushie's spin doctors have been rearranging and reinventing the facts to suit their own fear-fostering tactics?
No proof -- just a thought ....
1 comment:
Hey...unKnCandy...
How ya do'in, 'Bud'/'Budette'?
Just a 'thought', Aye!
Well, just 'Remember' Whadt 'my' 'Dear' Old Dad 'still' says about 'Whadt THOUGHT did one day?' j'Your 'probably' of the 'age' to know of the 'little' Saying of which I speak, without, my repeating the 'somewhadt' Blue ending to the verse.
No proof, Huh!
Would not a direct 'comparison' of the 'Suspect' Press Accounts, relating to the 'alleged' HighJacking, 'hypothesised' Bomb 'Manufacture' and 'subsQuent' Detonation, from 'both', the UK and the US 'Media', be sufficient!
I 'doubt', with 'all sincerity', thadt the 'Bumbling' BuSHiiite/Blair 'Co-Op', would have 'coordinated' their Media 'SpinZ's, successfully...Ya know!?!
Holt! I take thadt back. 'They' DO seem to 'git the Media 'L(y)ies and Spin' correct... It's just the 'Warz and Nation Building' they 'Faux Pas Up' on! :-) 'snuck one in on ya', ]:@), I did. But...
Finally, a Real ?qUestion? for ya, Could the NYT 'actually' be considered 'Lyiable' under UK Law, concerning the dispensation of 'news material' Pres-Judicial to the 'Case'? It IS a 'US' News Org., not a UK 'Company', Right?
Great 'talking' at ya...
Purr UsZe.
werepigz
and
HedgeHogz, UNITE!
}:@)
Oh yeah, Have a 'Happy' Memorial Day. Bro, err...Guy/or/Gal, I meant to 'insinuate'.
Seriously,
Have a Good One!
We all 'deserve'
'a break'
at some point.
See ya on the 'Funny' Pages.
Post a Comment