Wednesday, August 23, 2006

The Next Ned Lamont Needs YOUR Support

Check out Carl Sheeler, who is running for the US Senate in Rhode Island.

Learn about who he is, where he stands on the issues, and why he deserves our support.

Then do what you can to make sure he is the next Ned Lamont.

If you can spare a few bucks, please consider contributing to Carl so that he can extend his "Impeach Bush" Campaign ads through the primary (only 3 weeks away). Carl's goal is to raise just $20 from each of his supporting blogs -- I'm thinking we can bust that goal right outta the ball park. If just 20 of you give $1 each, we've made our goal. And hopefully, those who can afford it, will give a bit more. (Hey, we might even win a prize for raising the most bucks!)

This guy is worth it, people. We can help elect an ANTI-WAR, LIBERAL, Rhode Island DEMOCRAT to the Senate.

Remember, even if you're not from that state (I'm not either), the only way to wrestle the House and Senate away from the corporate financed, corrupt politicians is by electing people like Carl. He needs us -- And we need him.

CLICK HERE TO CONTRIBUTE!

Thanks for all you do, folks.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Yeah...
IyAM back...
Hey, Ya'Alllllllllllllll!
Screw Ned LaMont...'Olde' Joe'L is 'The Man' for Dems, Indies, and REpubes from ConnieCutte. Ned is a 'anti'War-Rider, iZ'all. WE,
need a 'Senator' who 'Stands' by 'His' decisions and 'will' cross 'Party' Lines to make 'Our' DemoCracy WORK. How many 'other' Sens. and CongMen. voted for this 'Li(Y)ed' InTo War with 'eYe'yie+yie=Raq. To 'my' LIMITED KNOWLEDGE...
[Of the 'Opposition' Senators] Only, Sen. Byrd and Sen. FeinGold, come to mind...Who??? Else? Sooo...Get Up Off IT! and, Yes, "WE" Need to 'Throw the BumZs OUT!' Gain a 'House' or 'TWO'!!! (Come November...Rem. 'The Fifth of November' "V" Style!?! REMEMBER, the Who, Whadt, Where, When and 'WHY') AND/BUT, for 'God's Sake' 'Keep the GooD and PowerFull'!?! Joe IS a 'Good Man' and 'Influential' Senator, 'WE' need the likes of 'Him'! Sooo, 'Let's Keep Him'...Mr UnKCanidate... WhadthFk did j'You Vote and 'Stand By' (under such intense and withering PRESSURE) Lateley???' I 'still' like ya, BUD!?!...BUT, Lay OFF 'Olde'Joe Lieber's Mom...I dont 'think' Ned (will be) 1/2 the Senator, Joe is (NOW), or for the 'Fore-Seeable-Future'. Period. 'Joe' IS A 'Man of 'His' Convictions.' Got IT. OK? OK!

Anonymous said...

OK...I'll be Fair. Just like, when I asked j'You about TmmyBah'oye FriedMan, I'll do the same with Fred/err/Ned LaMonte. Give 'me' cause to 'Throw 'Olde' Joe over, by telling 'me' Ned'z Stand on 'the' OTHER Importante' Issues...eXcluding 'THE' Waaahar Issue. "WE" all agree 'getting' un-En-'Que'-Cumbered from Eeee'RaQi iS 'EeeeSential' BUt...Take 'the Ball' from there...ole' Buddy ole' Pal'O'Mine...

The Unknown Candidate said...

Sorry, Conscience, you've got it wrong. First, Lamont stands for traditional Democratic values--something Lieberman has given short shrift in recent years. Plus, Lieberman is a neo-con, through and through, and their agenda is World Empire and Domination. What that means for you and me is that unless we're in their elite club of corruption, we're out of luck. The elites will get fatter and richer and the rest of us will get poorer and poorer. A vote for Lieberman is a vote against the common good. Don't be fooled by Lieberman's self-spin. Actions speak louder than words, and this guy is committed to Bushie's agenda. Even if he is only committed to BushCo's foreign policy -- that is MORE than enough reason to GET HIM OUT -- before the idiots succeed in starting World War III -- and they're closer than you think to doing just that. Why do you think Bush is not supporting the Republican candidate in Connecticut? Why do you think Karl Rove has offered help to Lieberman? Why do you think Lieberman was so eager to impeach Bill Clinton and hasn't said a word about Bush breaking more laws than any President in history? C'mon, Conscience .... you know better ....

Anonymous said...

Well, well, well...
Per usual, Thadt 'answer' rings 'damn' true. Considering 'my' knowledge on the 'Subject(s)' comes 'entirely' for the 'biased' Media (Left, Right and Center)...Your 'points', (AGAIN), are well taken (and 'received').
a. Lieber'Mom's 'self-spin', you bet'cha...as a 18 yr. 'standing' (elitest) Senator...'No One' would want to lose 'thath' Frakk'en 'Cherry' of a J.O.B. The Senate's 'whole' side of Congress IS 'our' elite 'Elitests', period. And, AnyWho! John Kerry, Elitest of the Elite! (for President in '04 and '08)? Sooo...By your 'standards' on 'Elites', in general, they 'all' should go. Right...?
b. Being a WVa 'voter', I 'think' I'll let the 'People' of CT, decide 'who' is best to 'Guide/Lead' their 'People's 'Political Future'. JoeL...or NO Joe, el'Ned?
b. Your 'point' about 'the REpubes', from 'pRes' BuSHiiiTe, Karl 'the Brain' Rove, on down...NOT 'endorsing' THEIR 'own' REpube Candidate (CT)...makes 'the TRUTH' of your argument perfectly (Crystal) clear.
c. Your 'impeahment' arguement (Joe on Billy C.) IS/WAS, also 'very' telling. 'Impeach' a 'sitting' President for 'personal' misconduct with a 'administrative' aide...BUT, NOT EVEN consider the 'SAME', for a pResident, who 'Flaunts, Denigrates, and {Intentionally} DisREgards the Constitution and breaks 'Our' County's basic 'Laws and Tenants', at 'his' ROYAL WILL!!!!!!!
You got me there UnKCand/Pal. Send 'Olde' Joe 'packing' for thadt 'NON' Sequitur 'BS' Stunt.
d. NeoCon 'World Empire and Domination'...Bad 'News' Sir/Mame! Most 'Americans' (not 'MeSelf', included, now) would'nt give thadt 'proposal' Short Shrift...AS long as, 'We/They' were the 'folks' getting 'FATTER and RICHER', and 'No' Terror Related Consequences would come back to 'Haunt'/ 'Roost' on the 'HomeLand'. 'Dat Fuhrer' would be just 'fine'. Cynical? YES! Truely, 'Sartre-Castic', You Bet! But, TRUE, None-the-Less. Just Ask'em!?! ...Breaking 'HeadLines' News... ..."America 'Rules' the World"...
'THADT' would be 'the' Show Stopper of 'A' HIT for the ~'New'~ American Millenium'!?!
e. WWIII...Its 'already' in Motion, Brother! The 'Players' and 'Pieces' are already 'Moving' and the 'Alignment' of 'States', is 'starting' to take place. I 'Hope' I'yAM wrong about this, But...'We' shall See whadthfk, 'We' shall See!
AND...Please!!! Don't write 'ME' off as some'kind'a 'Kook' for thadt 'statement', PLEASE! But/and/However...if 'Like Minded' People, like j'Your=Self can get the 'Reigns of Power' in this 'Country', just maybe, the 'Inevitable' Procession toward the 'Epitome' of a 'True World War' can be 'STOPPED'!?!
Just 'read' WB Yeats' Poem 'I've' provided below...

'The Second Coming'

(not of 'Christ', mind you, but, of the 'Horror' of an 'ALL OUT WAR', thadtz...my take on the 'Title') but...'Who' really knows?

...Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
"The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity."

(My emphasis.)

Surely some revelation is at hand;
Surely the Second Coming is at hand.
The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out
When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi
"Troubles my sight: somewhere in sands of the desert"

(again, mine.)

A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it
Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds.
The darkness drops again; but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,

"And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?"

-- William Butler Yeats

The 'WAR' will be about Jerusalem and 'ITS' 'Primacy and Status', for Isreali (Jew), Palestinian (Arab), and (Christian), alike. All 'personal' mystical/err/religion, aside...It 'will' come down to 'Thadt', The Centre of 'OUR' (Human) Universe.
Can't wait to 'hear' your REply, unKcanidate Guy. :-)

PS Please give me some info on Ned's 'Stands' on 'Traditional' Democratic Values...This is a sincere request. I 'really' dont know/see thadt much on the 'actual' stands he has taken for the CT voting public...
As Always your 'REplys' are 'enlightening' and 'appreciated'.
pHedgehog
}:@)

The Unknown Candidate said...

In response to (a) -- Right. As to the rest of your post, I agree with you for the most part -- not sure, however, exactly what you mean by the paragraph beginning: "The 'WAR' will be about Jerusalem and 'ITS' 'Primacy and Status' ...."

As for Lamont's positions: Look here.

By the way, I am not in agreement with all of his ideas; I believe in Universal Health Care for all Americans; he does not, for example. And I don't think that position-wise, he is the most impressive candidate. But for all the reasons already stated, I believe he will be better than Lieberman (or the Repug candidate).

Carl Sheeler, running for the Senate in Rhode Island, on the other hand, has positions on issues that are much closer to my own, which is why I am officially supporting him. Compare his positions to those of other candidates out there. Think you'll like him --Almost as much as I enjoyed Yeats "The Second Coming." Thanks for that. :)))

Anonymous said...

My 'JeruSalem' Paragraph was not meant to be 'Cryptic' or
'MisUnderstood'. I only meant to say thadt for some 'strange' and 'perplexing' reason...JeruSalem has 'always' been the Centre of 'our' Universe, ie.(where 'Western' thought meets 'Eastern' philosophy)/adding/to/and/creating a...(Clash of Civilizations). Of course, I'yAM eXcluding China's (Economic-Military based Capitalistic Communism), India's (Mega-Capitalism, backed by Nukes), and Japan's ('ReStructed' and somewhat 'Self-Restrained' former Military Industrial Complex). It, JeruSalem, does not overflow with 'worldly' riches. It is not a 'Garden of Eden' for farming or natural resources, and except for the 'Biblical/and/Political' Dispute over 'OwnerShip' SHOULD NOT be of any 'Special' interest to the rest of the 'World'.BUT IT IS! WHY? eXcept for 'Human History' , I have no other/better rationale. As I said earlier...BUT IT IS! Thus, 'my' pointing out of the William Butler Yeats poem...'The Second Coming'. It is 'Scary' in its 'Poinancy' and 'Depth' of 'our' present situation and its 'mystery' of Truth.
Sooo, back to whadt I meant by whadt I said...Jerusalem will be THE 'sticking' point for ANY 'MidEast' Deal. So much so, thadt 'total' War over thadt single 'City' is a 'highly' inevitable possibility. Sorry about 'my' fatalistic view point, BUT...can you envision ANY Isrealii Govt., thadt could/or/would 'deal' away the 'Eternal City' thadt their 'God' directed...'Kings' Saul, Solomen, and DAvid...even 'Herod the Great' to 'Rule' over? After 'All' the 'deadly' pogroms and 'temptestous' trials the 'Jewish' people have been through in the 'last' 2 Thousand Plus years...'They' will NOT be willing to just 'walk' away from 'IT' (JeruSalem, as their Capital City)!?! Not on 'our' lives. I 'just' can't Imagine, nor, Do I EVER think so...Thadt was/and/is 'my' 'ONLY' point concerning 'my' paragraph about 'WAR' and the 'City of JeruSalem.' Something 'any' US 'President' and 'Nation', as a 'Whole', will eventially have to 'comprehend' and 'deal' with...'Reasonablely and Rationally'...IF AT ALL POSSIBLE. 'Reason' and 'Rationality' does not 'normally' enter into a 2 Thousand year old 'Ethno-Religious' based 'Family' Feud.
See Ya...and...
Thank You so much for 'Your' Input and Info...Most of the time, I 'never' eXpect 'folks' to Respond to 'my' commentaries. So, Thanks Again...Some Day, You'll 'probably' be getting 'MY Vote'!?! No Promises, though. :-)
pHedgeHog
}:@)

Jack Steiner said...

Oy. This makes my head hurt.

Anonymous said...

National health care? No stated position on the unalienable individual, civil, Constititional, and human right of every man, woman, and responsible child to obtain, own, and carry, openly or concealed, any weapon -- rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- any time, any place, without asking anyone's permission? No thank you.